Full disclosure, I work for Microsoft. I wanted to point that out because many SA plans already include some sort of planning services in them. I remain shell-shocked. If YES, what licensing scheme is applicable? Or do you also need Server CALs? I mean that the server Windows R2 is only used for SQL Server R2 no file sharing, no printer sharing and is licensed per processor but it is a member server of a domain.
Ping me if you want more information. Twitter: sethmrodriquez. Thanks for writing this. If the physical cores in the server are licensed once, can I run multiple Enterprise edition SQL instances on the server?
Howard — sure, but generally instance stacking on the same Windows introduces a whole host no pun intended of other problems. My organization is fortunate enough to have a SQL Server site license. We have a need for microsoft sql server 2014 standard edition price free low performance SQL Server instances. I am under the impression that the scenario Howard Moneta described requires him to license all the cores for each individual instance of SQL Server on the box.
Elijah, that is in fact incorrect. The other use might be a three node cluster where one node is passive but we want all FCIs to be able to run on all nodes for manageability. PostgreSQL would seem an obvious choice. I guess it worth mentioning as well the minimum cores licencing. And yes getting into the virtualised servers then gets a bit funky for licencing like every other DBMS. The only thing I might add in…. We have a dba utility database on all our servers, including mirror-partners.
Do you know if that utility database requires the whole instance to be licensed? One could say that even running a monitoring tool against a mirror-partner might require licensing.
Talk to your rep about that. And make sure you get it in writing since the answer may not be under a strict interpretation of the rules.
We have done some testing and want to upgrade to an 8 core license. We have the quote for the extra cores but before we purchase I need to know the process for applying that to our current server. Any idea how that is accomplished, a new license key or upgrade to your existing key? Tim — you just need to have the receipts in hand when the licensing folks come knocking.
IE: Even if you had 8 installed it would only use 4 of them unless you had the correct key. What about Reporting Services? I stumbled across this when looking for licensing costs around Reporting Services. Does the same apply to Analysis Services? Or does that right only apply to SQL Database service?
Is it true if you have an Enterprise lisence then you can run SSRS on a seperate server without a lisence? The devs would of course only work on the dev instance but as soon the productive server goes offline it could switch to the standby instance on the dev-server.
BTW: is monitoring of the standby instance allowed e. Sir, to use enterprise edition of sql server, what minimum size should be there? In what case we can use this edition free of cost? To those interested in development servers, those are free if you pay for MSDN subscriptions that provide servers for development purposes.
That is the most economical way to do development because you do not have to pay attention to any other licensing rule except for having MSDN subscription for development. It can be downgraded but only to another Dev edition. Beware, auditors will not accept an EE thats supposed to be covered by a DE license regardless of how you use it. Rami — yes, but typically developers need more than just SQL Server. They usually need things like Visual Studio. My boss purchased two licenses as the server has four cores.
Not a dumb question at all! Hi, so scenario. But we would like to run backups from the secondary servers. Paul — what failover method are you using, failover clustering, database mirroring, Always On Availability Group, etc? I have machine with 4 cores. Do I have to take 4 microsoft sql server 2014 standard edition price free license per core or is there any other licensing microsoft sql server 2014 standard edition price free as well? Microsoft sql server 2014 standard edition price free that means just 1 license is required, which makes more sense.
Maybe they misunderstood…. On page 11, it says that I can run unlimited Microsoft sql server 2014 standard edition price free up to 1 per core in the host as long as I license every single core in my farm. Am I reading this correctly? Is this a fight worth having, or am I reading it wrong and I should give in to buying SA? Perhaps my comment is slightly outdated, but HT creates extra physical threads, which results to a necessity buying a license for 16 cores instead of 8.
Steve — for licensing questions, check out the questions link in the post. That way you can get exact confirmation from the folks who really know. Silly question I guess, but if I use a 2-core license on a 4-core system, will it work by using just 2 cores or microsoft sql server 2014 standard edition price free it not work at all?
Right — but in this case single core system the no of licenses is greater. My question is regarding when no of cores are greater will it 1 work using the cores it is licensed for 2 work using all cores or 3 not work at all.
This is going to sound odd, but have you actually installed SQL Server, run through the setup process? I knew I was sounding odd. Yes, of course, I have installed SQL. I was just wondering that when you enter the license key during setup, would it check the number of cores, and allow you to proceed only if you have the same number of cores that you are licensed for. Do I need 2 additional CALs if server is subscriber for 2 different publishers? I have two questions, we had some ops people install SQL Server Standard on what are our developer and test servers.
The other one with SQL Developer now being free what has changed in all this? A question on licensing test environment. It can be covered by MSDN license if we want to, but what if we have an enterprise agreement? Does that exempt us from being required to license the SQL test server? Or does this entirely depend on what the agreement states? Inas Database Mirroring is removed, would you happen to know if there a hard limit on the number of Basic Availability Groups we can have?
And in terms of licensing, if we only have 1 server accessing the database and all the users microsoft sql server 2014 standard edition price free they need to use the application have to RDP into the server to use the application, would that classify as 1 CAL then? Nikhil — first, about the CAL, no. Is it 10,1, or 10,? So that would be 8 Basic Availability Groups in total? In addition, If we were to purchase Standard with SA, and lets say 1 of those 8 BAG has a failure and has to failover to the second server, does that mean all of them have to move to the second server or failing over just 1 to the second server is fine and covered under licensing?
Database mirroring is NOT removed in The specific version of SQL Server has not been determined. For the Ozar community…having trouble getting this nailed down by MS or Software One, our licensing vendor. We have two VM Hosts. Non are Readable. The Issue: if we have a failover event…or we want to apply patching say add an SP. Back in the day, there was a day grace period to get Services back to the primary in the event of a failure.
What I want to know is if there is a grace period to get the primary active again. All or nothing issues…. They do this through a single user account, and there could be a varying number of employees sharing that account, depending on the severity of the issue.
We have User CALs for all of our employees that use the system for regular production use. Do I need User CALs for the currently unknown number of vendor employees that may log in to our system for support purposes? Hope that helps! This is an awesome thread for these questions. For example, the SQL server instance would service a web application we are developing and would microsoft sql server 2014 standard edition price free accessed by a service account for the web app, and by each developer as they test locally.
Each developer microsoft sql server 2014 standard edition price free already accessing multiple other SQL Server instances that are fully licensed, so I assume they have whatever client licenses they need. Thank you for any light you can shed! MSDN licenses are usually only for the person who has the subscription. But if you have an dual core server, you could install as many SQL instances on it as you want — but they will fight for the spare CPU-power and maybe RAMso that the server will be very slow.